Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background Double-blind peer review has been proposed as a possible solution to avoid implicit referee bias in academic publishing. The aims of this study are to analyse the demographics of corresponding authors choosing double blind peer review, and to identify differences in the editorial outcome of manuscripts depending on their review model. Methods Data includes 128,454 manuscripts received between March 2015 and February 2017 by 25 Nature-branded journals. We investigated the uptake of double blind review in relation to journal
منابع مشابه
Automatizing the Assignment of the Submitted Manuscripts to Reviewers: A Systematic Review of Research Texts
Purpose: To systematicly review the automatazation of the assignment of the submitted manuscripts to reviewers in order to identify the status of research studies in this field in terms of types of evidence of expertise, types of retrieval models used, and the research gaps, and finally some suggestions for has been offered for future research. Method: The current research followed the systema...
متن کاملبررسی سامانههای تحت وب عرضه و داوری مقالات از نظر قابلیتهای نقش نویسنده در نشریات مصوب وزارت بهداشت
Background and Aim: Online submission and peer review systems are formal channels of communication among authors, journal editorial boards, and reviewers. The review process starts after authors submit their manuscripts. The aim of this study is to examine the online article submission and peer review systems in terms of the capability in medical journals of Iranian Ministry of Health, and Medi...
متن کاملHow to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication
Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees’ comments. Little guidance is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments. Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxim...
متن کاملCritique of Manuscript-Correction/ The Role of Editors in Presenting the Author: A review of Toghray Mashhadi's biography in his newly published Book of Essays, Fatima Mehri
The Role of Editors in Presenting the Author A Review of Toghray Mashhadi's Biography in His Newly Published Book of Essays Fatemeh Mehri Associate Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Shahid Beheshti University [email protected] Abstract Researchers in the field of editing and correction manuscripts consider the writing of introductions as part of the correction process. T...
متن کاملDue diligence in the open-access explosion era: choosing a reputable journal for publication
Faculty are required to publish. Naïve and "in-a-hurry-to-publish" authors seek to publish in journals where manuscripts are rapidly accepted. Others may innocently submit to one of an increasing number of questionable/predatory journals, where predatory is defined as practices of publishing journals for exploitation of author-pays, open-access publication model by charging authors publication ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1802.02188 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2018